Thought Box

HAS BOLLYWOOD FORGOTTEN SCREEN LOVE

HAS BOLLYWOOD FORGOTTEN SCREEN LOVE

by Monojit Lahiri September 26 2026, 12:00 am Estimated Reading Time: 4 mins, 53 secs

Today, with crime nationalism, and action calling the shots has love vanished from the screens? Monojit Lahri investigates the fading language of cinematic romance, tracing Bollywood's greatest lovers and enduring emotional legacy across generations poignantly.

It has been said that the history of cinema is also a history of exciting, adventurous, and celebrated love affairs. Dead right, and for excellent reasons. The very nature of filmmaking provides the mood and milieu for two people thrown together, for continuous amorous encounters between them. Their close and constant physical contact with each other often begins to lead to (and off the sets) the romantic intimacies of the screenplay. Then again, they have an exclusive, subliminal, and indefinable psychological bond. Idolized and damned, in equal measure, these larger-than-life people fall upon each other for fulfilment, leading them to believe (with some truth) that only one star can truly understand, relate to, and love another. But how does love surface in the first place? And what does this divine madness do to on-screen lovers? Does it actually help them emote better?

The Golden Age of Screen Romance

According to many distinguished people who pass their lives tossing educated opinions on on-screen love in Bollywood, Dilip Kumar, Raj Kapoor, and Dev Anand were the greatest. Let’s take Dilip first. In an environment filled with hammy overacting, Dilip was perhaps the first actor in Bombay to introduce the rare, dignified, and yet powerful element of restraint. And this element naturally crept into his love scenes. The Dilip-Madhubala, Dilip-Vyjayanthimala, Dilip-Meena, and Dilip-Waheeda teams have love scenes fashioned by this wonderfully refreshing trait. A quiet, intense, sensitive (often to the point of shyness) lover who very nearly doesn’t make it. The near-lover, the puzzled introvert—these are some labels that come to mind while recollecting Dilip and his intense version of love from the heart.

In total contrast was the Raj-Nargis team. Loud, boisterous, and always full of life and laughter, this team brought into their love scenes a daring and pizzazz that was completely Western in concept and unknown in popular Indian cinema before. The Raj-Nargis love scenes were very passionate, beautiful, and often very physical. The heady fever comes through loud n’ clear when you compare Devdas, Daag, and Paigham with Barsaat, Awara, and Shree 420.

If Dilip and his heroines brought intensity, sensitivity, and restraint into their love scenes, Raj-Nargis brought passion, boldness, and undiluted physicality—then Dev Anand, of the nodding head, tossed out contemporariness to the mobs. Neither too serious nor overtly passionate, they brought in style. From Suraiya to Tina Munim, Dev’s love scenes (Manzil, Paying Guest, Jab Pyaar..., Asli Naqli, Guide, and Des Pardes) have always been sprinkled with rare flamboyance.

Then there was Guru Dutt too, who blazed with all cylinders firing and lit up the screen with lady love Waheeda Rehman in classics like Pyaasa, Kagaz Ke Phool, Chaudvin Ka Chand, and Sahib Biwi Aur Ghulam, but his was a different scene.

Interestingly, all these big-dads emoted much better (as their films reveal) when in love or in a special bonding with their heroines. The only REAL inheritor of their legacy was Rajesh Khanna, who, in the early seventies, brought back love (in all his crinkled-eyed glory) to where it belonged—centre stage.

From Passion to Packaging

Moving on, Shah Rukh Khan and Kajol may well have been voted the “most romantic couple of the day” through an opinion poll (in 2012), and DDLJ their “all-time favourite movie”, but somehow it can never be the same. Pure, raging, insane passion—love that you could die for—has been replaced by love parading as a designer emotion, a fashion statement, fun n’ cool, with sensuous body language in place of the restrained expressions of love, loss, and longing.

Further, today, in a world where “speed” is the watchword and “quantity” the cardinal turn-on, love has become a publicity gimmick, a marketing tool, a selling force in social media often (at the joint instance of stars and producers) designed to psyche and hustle the turned-on mobs into storming a movie. As can be gathered, this blitz is normally machine-gunned before the release of a film. What these dumbbells don’t understand is that publicity can’t sell a lousy movie. Nor can curry-dipped rumours. At most, they can create a climate of excitement which, however, could—and does—dangerously boomerang if the promise does not match the performance.

Out here I’ll make an exception: Mohit Suri’s Saiyara, the recent romantic drama starring Aneet Padda and Ahaan Panday. We never heard of the leading pair until the film was released, and what a hit it turned out to be after. It proves my point that you treat a film as cinema, not as a social media outburst seeking eyeballs and fizzling out by the time the film hits the screen.

Has Romance Become Disposable?

Once upon a time, love was romance. Dilip holding his Queen of Hearts protectively in his arms while his eyes blazed defiance at his royal father; Raj embracing his woman passionately; Dev prancing around with his lady love. All that resides in the fluffy soft focus of a distant past. Today, love appears to be less of a sublime emotion and more of a consumer perishable along the FMCG line. To be clinical is to be in. Increasingly, the primacy of permissiveness has replaced love with sex—an ingredient so artificially (and seductively) relevant that filmmakers have appointed themselves as lab specialists. They have detailed, magnified, and celebrated titillation in the mainline commercial—and, in doing so, destroyed emotion, buried passion, corrupted intimacy, killed charm, and de-mystified romance… forever. And the loss remains completely ours.  




Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of thedailyeye.info. The writers are solely responsible for any claims arising out of the contents of this article.